User talk:Michaeldsuarez

It may be a hopeless to expect any change from Isenhand or Andrew Wallace/Network of European Technocrats director. He has a track record of not cooperating here and elsewhere. I could list a multitude of sites that his group has been removed from. He came here, it is pretty obvious, to control and manipulate information... much of which is not information that is accurate... but leads in circles to himself... his book.. his group.. and his website... which is not notable... as he himself is not notable... and is a money collection site that is focused more on pay pal and monetary schemes... and yes... ego, than any thing... (my opinion... and not only my opinion), Wallace and his group have already been either banned for spamming or considered non notable on multiple information sites (The NET site is black listed as spam on Wikipedia because of actions by himself and his group). I would say that he has now found almost a personal blog, to display edits that conform to his self published book, now here on wikia. This seems very obvious to me, and I wonder why this is tolerated.

One article that I put up he deleted. Pity because http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Willard_Gibbs and his information on thermodynamics made possible Scott's later thesis on energy accounting, which Scott acknowledged his debt to.

Andrew Wallace has also denigrated Howard Scott... totally unfairly... the information he is using is from 1930's propaganda put out then by the New York Times and the Hearst Corporation. This also is a real pity. Since most all of Isenhands book is used to source his ideas, and he picked a limited range of people and their ideas to base his ideas on, and my opinion is that his book misconstrues the information to what I consider a very odd p.o.v. -- I do firmly believe that Isenhand should be removed as Admin. If not it appears that over and over and over he will promote his book... his website... his group... his self.

I would like to begin to edit the articles to improve them... but that is not being allowed currently. What time I spend here is mostly trying to make neutral or correct wrong information, which then is reverted by Isenhand. Tbonepickensetc 00:14, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

conflict between certain parties
I am aware the history of conflict between certain parties, and my usual approach is to ignore it and only make comments that would be constructive within the context of an article. Conflicts between other people are there own business, and I'm going to stay out of it as, from my experience, most of the time it is non-constructive and just a waste of time getting involved. Firebladed 15:33, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Tbone
I gave Tbonepickens several warnings and many chances to improve his behavior, but since he can't seem to edit about technocracy or the feud constructively I have finally blocked him from this wiki. I hope that you and Isenhand and Firebladed can continue to edit here in good faith, and even incorporate helpful information from his edits -- I have no interest in censoring content, and I feel wikis become more useful when they document differences of opinion rather than trying to suppress one side or the other. It's unfortunate that he could not behave in a more professional fashion.

Thank you very much for the welcome template and the work you are putting in here; I sincerely appreciate everything you have done. — Catherine (talk) 20:14, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Admin. Request
Hi Michael. I would like to request adminship of the Technocracy wiki. I am a neutral pov editor and will do my best to expand the wiki. I am much experienced as an editor on Wikipedia and will strive to follow good guidelines and do the best possible job in expanding information. Thanks, and regards - Tbonepickensetc 14:37, September 26, 2009 (UTC)